<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>joshedwards.com &#187; wordplay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joshedwards.com/tag/wordplay/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joshedwards.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:15:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>double-u, double-u, double-u</title>
		<link>http://joshedwards.com/2010/11/29/double-u-double-u-double-u/</link>
		<comments>http://joshedwards.com/2010/11/29/double-u-double-u-double-u/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[weblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NY Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordplay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshedwards.com/?p=1461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is from a few weeks ago, but I love word origins, here&#8217;s the etymology of the world wide web: &#8220;Web.&#8221;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is from a few weeks ago, but I love word origins, here&#8217;s the etymology of the world wide web: &#8220;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/14/magazine/14FOB-onlanguage-t.html">Web</a>.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://joshedwards.com/2010/11/29/double-u-double-u-double-u/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Word Cloud</title>
		<link>http://joshedwards.com/2010/03/22/word-cloud/</link>
		<comments>http://joshedwards.com/2010/03/22/word-cloud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[weblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dubai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newlywed in Dubai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordplay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshedwards.com/?p=571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found this website, Wordle.net that builds word clouds out of text files.
So I uploaded the 380 pages of my Newlywed in Dubai: Best of the Blog book and came up with this:

Pretty cool.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this website, <a href="http://www.wordle.net/">Wordle.net</a> that builds word clouds out of text files.</p>
<p>So I uploaded the 380 pages of my <a href="http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/invited/544802/b628c6ec2ea75a7184c1ed4983ac4a9d"><em>Newlywed in Dubai: Best of the Blog</em></a> book and came up with this:</p>
<p><a href="http://joshedwards.com/wp-content/uploads/20100322_wordle.png"><img src="http://joshedwards.com/wp-content/uploads/20100322_wordle-400x253.png" alt="" title="20100322_wordle" width="400" height="253" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-572" /></a></p>
<p>Pretty cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://joshedwards.com/2010/03/22/word-cloud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Words From the Recession</title>
		<link>http://joshedwards.com/2010/03/11/new-words-from-the-recession/</link>
		<comments>http://joshedwards.com/2010/03/11/new-words-from-the-recession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[weblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Science Monitor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordplay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshedwards.com/?p=410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Christian Science Monitor has some new words from our current economic times.  Check out: &#8220;Recession slang: 10 new terms for a new economy.&#8221;
Sigh:
2. Permatemp, n. The condition of being permanently employed as a temporary worker. 
This could be due to lack of motivation to seek permanent employment, inability to find permanent employment, or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <em>Christian Science Monitor </em>has some new words from our current economic times.  Check out: &#8220;<a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/Money/new-economy/2010/0308/Recession-slang-10-new-terms-for-a-new-economy">Recession slang: 10 new terms for a new economy</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sigh:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>2. Permatemp, n. </strong><em>The condition of being permanently employed as a temporary worker. </em></p>
<p>This could be due to lack of motivation to seek permanent employment, inability to find permanent employment, or the permatemp&#8217;s belief that a company will eventually hire him/her for the job s/he is currently doing for lower pay and without benefits. </p>
<p>Sample sentence: &#8220;Wake up, Joe. You&#8217;ve been here for six months, your cubicle is decorated better than your living room, and the hiring manager still doesn&#8217;t know your name. You&#8217;re officially a permatemp, my friend.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Next week?  My twenty-sixth in this job.</p>
<p>You do the math.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://joshedwards.com/2010/03/11/new-words-from-the-recession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Portmanteaux</title>
		<link>http://joshedwards.com/2010/03/11/portmanteaux/</link>
		<comments>http://joshedwards.com/2010/03/11/portmanteaux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[weblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NY Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[things that I agree with]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordplay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshedwards.com/?p=398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This New York Times &#8220;On Language&#8221; column is from a couple of weeks ago, but it&#8217;s clever and educational and portmanteaus (portmanteaux?) are always fun.
Plus I agree with Mr. Garner that blog is &#8220;the ugliest neologism of the last century&#8221;.
Check out: &#8220;Webinar.&#8221;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This New York <em>Times</em> &#8220;On Language&#8221; column is from a couple of weeks ago, but it&#8217;s clever and educational and portmanteaus (portmanteaux?) are always fun.</p>
<p>Plus I agree with Mr. Garner that <em>blog </em>is &#8220;the ugliest neologism of the last century&#8221;.</p>
<p>Check out: &#8220;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/28/magazine/28FOB-onlanguage-t.html">Webinar</a>.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://joshedwards.com/2010/03/11/portmanteaux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South African Slang</title>
		<link>http://joshedwards.com/2010/03/10/south-african-slang/</link>
		<comments>http://joshedwards.com/2010/03/10/south-african-slang/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[weblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afrikaans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NY Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordplay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshedwards.com/?p=352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So as you know South Africa is hosting the FIFA World Cup in June.  

Ahead of that, the &#8220;Schott&#8217;s Vocab&#8221; blog on the New York Times  has a list of South African slang.  
Check out: &#8220;Soccer World Cup Slang.&#8221;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So as you know South Africa is hosting the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_FIFA_World_Cup">FIFA World Cup</a> in June.  </p>
<p><img src="http://joshedwards.com/wp-content/uploads/20100310_southafrica-400x266.png" alt="South African flag" title="20100310_southafrica" width="200" height="133" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-355" /></p>
<p>Ahead of that, the &#8220;Schott&#8217;s Vocab&#8221; blog on the New York <em>Times </em> has a list of South African slang.  </p>
<p>Check out: &#8220;<a href="http://schott.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/09/elsewhere-soccer-world-cup-slang/">Soccer World Cup Slang</a>.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://joshedwards.com/2010/03/10/south-african-slang/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Number</title>
		<link>http://joshedwards.com/2010/03/04/new-number/</link>
		<comments>http://joshedwards.com/2010/03/04/new-number/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[weblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupid idea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telegraph.co.uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordplay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshedwards.com/?p=284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No.  
No, no, no, no: &#8220;Hella number: scientists call for new word for 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.&#8221;
Before this article I&#8217;d never heard of &#8220;Yotta-&#8221; before (it means Septillion) and now they want a number beyond that.  Guess &#8220;Octillion&#8221; is too much like Octo-mom?
But &#8220;Hella-&#8221; is too much like No Cal &#8220;hella&#8220;, which I feel is hella [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.  </p>
<p>No, no, no, no: &#8220;<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/7352204/Hella-number-scientists-call-for-new-word-for-1000000000000000000000000000.html">Hella number: scientists call for new word for 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Before this article I&#8217;d never heard of &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yotta-">Yotta-</a>&#8221; before (it means Septillion) and now they want a number beyond that.  Guess &#8220;Octillion&#8221; is too much like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nadya_Suleman">Octo-mom</a>?</p>
<p>But &#8220;Hella-&#8221; is too much like No Cal &#8220;<a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=hella">hella</a>&#8220;, which I feel is <em>hella </em>lame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://joshedwards.com/2010/03/04/new-number/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mengagement Rings</title>
		<link>http://joshedwards.com/2010/02/26/mengagement-rings/</link>
		<comments>http://joshedwards.com/2010/02/26/mengagement-rings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[weblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NY Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordplay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshedwards.com/?p=181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think I&#8217;ve linked to this blog before, but quite frankly I&#8217;m feeling too lazy right now to check.  &#8220;Schott&#8217;s Vocab&#8221; is a blog on the New York Times that is a &#8220;repository of unconsidered lexicographical trifles — some serious, others frivolous, some neologized, others newly newsworthy.&#8221;
Fun puns, if you will.
Today&#8217;s entry is particularly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;ve linked to this blog before, but quite frankly I&#8217;m feeling too lazy right now to check.  &#8220;Schott&#8217;s Vocab&#8221; is a blog on the New York <em>Times </em>that is a &#8220;repository of unconsidered lexicographical trifles — some serious, others frivolous, some neologized, others newly newsworthy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fun puns, if you will.</p>
<p>Today&#8217;s entry is particularly amusing because Liz and I actually did this (with a $5 ring, though): &#8220;<a href="http://schott.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/26/mengagement-rings/">Mengagement Rings</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>One line interested me, though, &#8220;For a certain generation, in Britain especially, to spot a husband wearing a wedding band is rare.&#8221;</p>
<p>Men don&#8217;t wear wedding rings in England?!  Can we confirm that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://joshedwards.com/2010/02/26/mengagement-rings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
